National Consensus on Contraindications for Corneal Donation for Transplantation in Switzerland.

PURPOSE: To establish a national consensus on contraindications for corneal donation for transplantation in Switzerland. METHODS: Swisstransplant (SWT), the Swiss national foundation coordinating tissue and organ donations, convened a working group consisting of six national corneal surgeons and eye bankers and donation experts to create a contraindication list for corneal donation. The group reviewed available national and international guidelines and recommendations, while adhering to Swiss law and transplant regulations. In cases of opposing opinions, the group held follow-up meetings until a consensus was reached. A consensus was defined as agreement among all parties present. RESULTS: From March 2021 to November 2021, the study group held six meetings and created a standardized minimal contraindication list for corneal donation in Switzerland. Thanks to this list, SWT has created a mandatory working and documentation file for donor coordinators to use when evaluating multiorgan donors for corneal harvesting. The authors agreed that while the national consensus list provides standardized minimal contraindication criteria, local eye banks may choose to introduce additional, more rigorous criteria. CONCLUSION: Given that corneal transplantation is the most commonly performed transplantation, establishing a consensus on contraindications is crucial for recipient safety. The creation of a consensus on contraindications for corneal donation in Switzerland is an essential contribution to fulfil the legal requirements concerning quality assurance and provides sufficient high-quality donor tissue within the country. Therefore, periodic review and revision of the consensus is considered critical.

[Attach importance to the orderly development of different corneal transplant procedures].

There are various surgical methods for corneal transplantation, each requiring precise treatment tailored to the characteristics and different layers of corneal opacity or lesions. These layers include the corneal epithelium, stroma (lamellar), and corneal endothelium, with options for full-thickness (penetrating) corneal transplantation or artificial corneal transplantation. However, a current issue in clinical practice is that, regardless of the degree of corneal disease, the availability of corresponding eye bank support, or surgical conditions, classic penetrating (full-thickness) corneal transplantation is universally performed. Alternatively, there is a trend toward adopting technically demanding procedures such as endothelial transplantation and artificial corneal transplantation. This trend has led to increased postoperative complications and the wastage of corneal donor materials. Choosing the appropriate corneal transplant procedure can offer advantages such as preserving more healthy corneal tissue, conserving corneal donors, facilitating rapid vision recovery, and minimizing the risk of immune rejection. Corneologists need to master the indications for various corneal transplant surgeries and systematically perform different corneal transplant procedures based on the surgeon's skills, hospital conditions, and eye bank conditions. This approach aims to enhance the success rate of the surgery.

Performance outcomes from a DMEK peeling and preparation wet lab.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) preparation performance of trainee surgeons in an ex vivo human donor cornea DMEK wet lab simulation setting. METHODS: Human donor corneoscleral rims unsuitable for transplantation were obtained from Moorfields Lions Eye Bank. At the wet lab, graft stripping was performed by scoring the peripheral endothelium. The trypan blue positive cells (TBPC) and cell density (cells/mm2-reticule count) were counted manually before and after stripping. The procedural time, peripheral and central tears and complete peel-off were also recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Eight trainee surgeons attended the wet lab each attempting three DMEKs. Between the first and last attempts a significant decrease was seen in the procedural time (17.6 min vs 10.6 min (p<0.05)) and the TBPC % (12.9% vs 3.8% (p<0.05)). The percentage of tears peripherally and centrally also reduced between the first and the last trials (50% vs 13% (p=0.2226) and 38% vs 0% (p=0.1327)). A significant correlation was found between longer peeling times and higher TBPC % (p<0.001) with a 0.7% endothelial mortality increase for each additional minute required to complete the peel. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK wet labs provide a controlled risk-free learning opportunity for trainee surgeons to improve confidence and competence. Wet labs improve the success rate of DMEK graft preparation as well as flatten the learning curve. This emphasises the importance of continued support for the expansion of this valuable learning resource, promoting wider uptake of DMEK surgery.

Corneal endothelial validation in the eye bank: differences in automated methods and repeatability.

PURPOSE: To evaluate reproducibility of endothelial cell density (ECD) measurements using the Konan Cell Check D in donor corneas by two different ophthalmologists and to compare the two automated cell count methods (center and flex-center) available in the software of this specular microscope. METHODS: ECD values were quantified in 54 donor corneas by two independent investigators using the Cell Check D (Konan Medical USA Inc) with both automated cell count methods. In the center method, at least 30 contiguous cells are marked. For the flex-center method, an area is delineated and only the cells within the designated area are counted. RESULTS: The mean ECD was 2473.81±378.22 cells/mm2. Good ECD intergrader reproducibility for the center (ICC=0.821) and the flex-center method (ICC=0.784) were noted. Poor reliability was observed for coefficient of variation and hexagonality (ICC≤0.265). When both methods for ECD analysis were compared, a moderate correlation for the two independent graders using the two manual (center and flex-center) methods was detected (correlation coefficient of 0.678 and 0.745 for each of the investigators). Comparison between methods yielded significantly higher ECD with the flex-center method (P=0.013). When corneas were divided by ECD, those under 2200 cells/mm2 and those between 2200 and 2700 cells/mm2 also had significantly higher ECD with the flex-center method (P<0.022). CONCLUSIONS: ECD values are reproducible with both methods, although the flex-center method ECDs tend to be higher, particularly in cases of low ECD. Eye banks and surgeons should exercise caution in making decisions based only on small differences in ECD.

Principais motivos de descarte de córneas para transplante na Paraíba: por que o anti-HBc merece atenção?* / Main reasons for discarding corneas for transplant in Paraíba: why does anti-HBc deserve attention?*

RESUMO Objetivo: Identificar o perfil dos doadores de tecidos oculares humanos na área de atuação do Banco de Olhos da Paraíba, destacando o impacto da sorologia positiva para hepatite B no descarte dos tecidos para transplante. Métodos: O estudo é transversal e utilizou dados do Banco de Olhos da Paraíba entre janeiro de 2013 e dezembro de 2022. Dados sobre procedência, idade, sexo, causa do óbito, tempo entre óbito e enucleação, resultados sorológicos e motivo de descarte das córneas dos doadores foram coletados. Resultados: O maior motivo de descarte foi por sorologia positiva (56,5%), sendo positivadas as sorologias positivas para hepatite B e HBsAg em 11,1% e 4,75% dos pacientes, respectivamente. Conclusão: A sorologia positiva para hepatite B como um critério de descarte absoluto é responsável por grande parcela de descartes, apesar da pouca informação sobre suas repercussões e representação de infectividade nos receptores do transplante.

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify the profile of human ocular tissue donors in the area covered by the Eye Bank of Paraíba (PB), highlighting the impact of positive serology for hepatitis B (anti-HBc) in the disposal of tissues for transplantation. Methods: This is a cross-sectional that uses data from the Eye Bank of Paraíba (PB) between January 2013 and December 2022. Data on origin, age, sex, cause of death, time between death and enucleation, serological results, and reason for discarded donor corneas were collected. Results: The main reason for discarding was due to positive serology (56.5%), with positive anti-HBc and HBsAg serology in 11.1% and 4.75% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: Anti-HBc positive serology as an absolute disposal criterion is responsible for great part of disposals, despite little information about its repercussions and representation of infectivity in transplant recipients.

[Analysis of factors affecting the quality of donor corneal endothelial cells].

Objective: To explore the factors influencing the quality of donor corneal endothelium. Methods: A retrospective case series study was conducted. Data from 568 donor corneas obtained from the Shandong Eye Bank between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, were collected for analysis. The corneal endothelium of the donor corneas was observed using corneal endothelial microscopy to assess corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation, and hexagonal cell ratio (HEX). Relevant factors of corneal donors were collected, including gender, age, cause of death, season of death, time from death to corneal retrieval, and methods of corpse preservation, to investigate their impact on the quality of donor corneal endothelium. The age factor was divided into five age groups: 0-20 years, 21-40 years, 41-60 years, 61-80 years, and >80 years. The time of corneal retrieval was divided into three periods based on the time elapsed since the donor's death: <6 hours, 6-12 hours, and >12 hours. The relationship between these factors and corneal endothelial conditions was analyzed. Results: The 568 donor corneas were obtained from 288 donors, including 225 males (78.13%) and 63 females (21.87%). The mean age was 51.77±18.48 years. The causes of death among donors were as follows: cardiovascular diseases 54.58% (275 individuals), cancer 17.96% (74 individuals), organ failure 14.26% (49 individuals), and accidents 13.20% (64 individuals). The mean time of corneal retrieval after donor death was 140 (76, 400) minutes (ranging from 30 minutes to 45 hours). Among the 145 corneas (25.53%) that had their initial corneal endothelial microscopy examination, the images were not clear, and after thorough rewarming, 106 corneas (18.7%) still had unclear images and could not be analyzed. Among the 462 corneas (81.3%) with clear images, the ECD was (2 602.23±318.40) cells/mm², the coefficient of variation was 36.61%±4.81%, and the HEX was 52.73%±7.15%. The ECD of corneas from older donors was lower compared to younger donors, and the differences between age groups were statistically significant (P<0.001). Corneas from donors who died due to accidents had a higher ECD [(2 829.88±313.90) cells/mm²] compared to those who died from cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and organ failure, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.001). The ECD was highest when corneas were retrieved within 6 hours after death, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Older donors had higher coefficients of variation but lower HEX values (both P<0.05). Corneas retrieved after a longer time from death had higher coefficients of variation, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in HEX (P>0.05). Organ failure, cryopreservation, and corneal retrieval time >12 hours were risk factors for unclear corneal endothelial imaging (all P<0.001). Among the 136 corneal endothelial images (23.94%), circular, oval, or band-shaped dark areas were observed, and corneas with dark areas had lower ECD (P<0.05). The longer the time elapsed from death to corneal retrieval, the more dark areas were observed (P<0.001). The presence of dark areas did not affect the coefficient of variation and HEX (P>0.05). Conclusion: Advanced donor age, death due to chronic diseases, longer time elapsed from death to corneal retrieval, and cryopreservation of the body lead to a decrease in the quality of donor corneal endothelium.

Corrective and preventive actions (CAPAs) in eye bank.

This case series highlights the challenges in eye banking and the importance of a quality assurance program. Three cases triggered corrective and preventive actions (CAPAs) to improve the processes. Case 1 emphasized training to prevent retrieval failures. Case 2 stressed the need for blood samples and comprehensive documentation. In Case 3, mishandling led to policy revisions and staff training. CAPA involved identifying concerns, root cause analysis, action plans, implementation, checks, and closure. Errors can occur in man, machinery, process, and policies. Continuous CAPA ensures continuous quality improvement and safe corneal tissue transplantation, benefiting patients in need.

Evolution of eye banking in India - A review.

Corneal blindness ranks third among the causes of blindness worldwide, after cataract and glaucoma. Corneal transplantation offers us a means to address this, and is currently the most commonly performed transplantation procedure worldwide - restoring the gift of sight to many an eye. Eye banks play a very important role in these procedures. India was quick to develop its own eye bank in 1945 soon after the launch of world's first eye bank in 1944. The evolution over the past six decades has been tremendous, placing India on the top, with one of the largest eye-banking system in the world. As of 2023, around 740 members are registered under the Eye Bank Association of India. The highest-ever collection of 71,700 donor eyes was achieved in 2017-2018. The overall tissue utilisation rate ranged between 22 - 28 % for voluntary donations and 50% for hospital-based corneal retrieval programs. Though India has an excellent infrastructure and readiness for corneal transplantation surgery, the need of the hour is to create a strong and independent nodal system. It shall take care of the logistics and factor in technological advances - surgical and otherwise. Public awareness, a national corneal grid, and reducing the red-tape barriers, shall improve availability of grafts nationwide. This review aims to detail the evolution of eye banking in India, to provide a comprehensive understanding, and help the stakeholders focus on the road ahead to attain our targets faster.

Corneal blindness and eye banking: Current strategies and best practices.

Corneal blindness (CB) is one of the leading causes of blindness in India and globally, affecting around 8 million population worldwide. Many of these corneal blind patients may be visually rehabilitated by corneal transplantation (CT). Eye banking plays a crucial role in facilitating CT and ocular research. Many countries have adopted regulatory frameworks, quality assurance programs, and technological advancements to enhance the efficacy and safety of CT. Various infrastructural and organizational frameworks of eye banks (EBs) in India, according to the Eye Bank Association of India (EBAI), aid in establishing guidelines and standards for EB practices. Initiatives such as the National Programme for Control of Blindness (NPCB) have significantly contributed to eye donation rates and improved access to donor corneas. This review article discusses the established eye banking networks in countries such as India, the United States (USA), and Europe, where dedicated EB organizations work collaboratively to ensure efficient procurement, processing, and distribution of corneal tissue. It also highlights specific strategies employed in India and global countries to address EBs' challenges. These challenges include the shortage of donor corneas, improving donor screening and tissue processing techniques, ensuring timely distribution of corneal tissue, and maintaining high-quality standards. Interestingly, the comparative analysis between India and other developed countries highlights the similarities and differences in eye banking strategies. By understanding the strategies employed by different regions, EBs can learn from each other's experiences and work toward achieving optimal outcomes in CT and ocular research worldwide. It underscores the importance of knowledge sharing and collaborative efforts in addressing common challenges and implementing best practices in eye banking.

P23-A137†Cross-border cooperation for corneal donation between lions eye bank Saar-Lor-Lux, Trier/Westpfalz in Homburg/Saar and Luxembourg.

PURPOSE: With the increasing demand for corneas, eye banks must optimize and extend their sources of tissue donation. On the other hand, corneal transplantation is a specialized procedure performed in hospitals with high quality standards and ideally an integrated eye bank. In this report we would like to focus on an international win-win-win agreement between the Department of Ophthalmology at Saarland University Medical Center (Homburg/Saar, Germany), the LIONS Eye Bank Saar-Lor-Lux, Trier/Westpfalz and the four major non-university hospitals without corneal transplantation competence in Luxembourg. METHODS: In 2012, at the initiative of the Luxembourgish Ministry of Health and Department of Ophthalmology (Homburg/Saar, Germany), an international agreement was established with the Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg (Luxembourg). Administrative and legislative rules were developed. Luxembourgish nursing personnel attended a practical training program for corneal excision at the Department of Ophthalmology in Homburg/Saar allowing them to harvest the two first corneal donors on site by themselves during the first year. In the following years two more hospitals, the Centre Hospitalier Emile Mayrisch (Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg) and the Hôpitaux Robert Schuman (Kirchberg, Luxembourg), joined the cooperation. RESULTS: From 2012 until 2021, three hospitals in Luxembourg donated 779 corneas to the LIONS Eye Bank of the Saarland University Medical Center in Homburg/Saar (Germany). In return, 308 Luxembourgish patients have received a corneal transplantation at the Department of Ophthalmology in Homburg/Saar. In 2022, the extension continued and an agreement with a fourth hospital in Luxembourg at the Centre Hospitalier du Nord (Ettelbruck, Luxembourg) was signed providing even more donations. CONCLUSION: The cross-border collaboration for corneal donation and patient treatment has proven to be successful with both numbers of harvested donors and transplanted patients rising. However, international legislation for tissue donation needs to be accurately respected and a quality management system established to provide continuous quality of the donor tissue.

P28-A146†The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on eye banking in the Lublin Eye Bank, Poland.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Lublin Eye Bank activities. METHODS: We compared the corneal donors screening rules, number of harvested corneas before, during, and after the pandemic (2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 years). RESULTS: In 2019 we had 182 corneal donors and 360 harvested corneas; in 2020 - 114 donors and 227 corneas; in 2021 - 151 donors and 300 corneas, and in 2022 till the 15th November - 115 donors and 228 corneas. From the 11th March 2020, when the World Health Organization had declared a global pandemic, our Eye Bank ceased all activities until the 10th May 2020. We started then, according to recommendations of Polish Transplantation Society, performing a nasopharyngeal swabs specimen collecting for every corneal donor. In 2020 we noted only 1 positive donor, whereas in 2021 we had 9 and in 2022 - 12 SARS-CoV-2 positive donors, respectively. Overall mean reduction in the number of corneal donors and obtained corneal tissues of 6,3% was observed in the Lublin Eye Bank CONCLUSION: COVID-19 pandemic had an influence on the Lublin Eye Bank activities.Fortunately, the pandemic did not have a major impact on the number of donors as well as the corneas collected in our bank.

P25-A123†Indo - German GIZ collaboration - impact and way forward in global eye banking.

PURPOSE: Geographical imbalance in cornea supply is a key feature of global eye banking. Most countries of South Asia particularly India suffer from donor cornea shortage which limits the number of keratoplasties, thereby aggravating the already high burden of removable blindness. The purpose of the project is to identify and cross-pollinate best practices from two leading eye banking institutions in India and Germany, and thereby improve service delivery of both systems. The project is supported by the GIZ Hospital Partnerships funding program on behalf of the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) with a co-financing by the Else Kröner-Fresenius Foundation (EKFS). It started in 2021 and will last upto 2023. METHODS: A joint expert group from both organisations conducted a series of workshops to identify the areas of intervention and specific practices to be introduced at the Indian partner's region. The overall increase in cornea collections and transplants, documented systemic improvement measures and research output were defined as the key outcomes. RESULTS: Interim results are presented here. Two interventions identified were expansion of catchment area of cornea collection in India, and improved information management system to monitor the progress and efficiency of the collection centres. Under the former intervention, the hub-and-spoke model from the German partner was introduced to the most populous state of India through establishment of two new cornea collection centres (spokes) for Hospital based Cornea collections. In six months these centres have supplied 79 donor corneas leading to 63 transplants at the hub. Under the latter intervention, the specifications of a baseline data capture and operations management system which can be used in low resource settings are being developed. CONCLUSION: The initiative has shown how best practice from one geography can be adapted and successfully implemented in another geography , Furthermore, the public knowledge resources created in the project can be used by other eye banks to advance eye banking in their respective countries.

P17-A140†Clinical outcomes of the first organ-cultured preloaded DMEK-a single centre studie.

The use of ready-to-use grafts from specialized eye banks might provide a number of benefits, including graft quality control, assured availability at a certain operation time, a decreased likelihood of case cancellation, and a shorter and less sophisticated DMEK surgery, with a resulting lower risk of graft damage. However, it is critical to thoroughly establish the clinical safety of employing these preloaded tissues. Especially since most of the studies were prepared and stored under hypothermic conditions. There are only a few studies on preprepared tissues in organ culture, which are partly controversial.In this prospective study we included patients who received DMEK surgery at the Knappschaft Eye Clinic Sulzbach. Patients received either a preloaded DMEK (pDMEK), prepared five days before surgery in the eye bank, or a conventional, directly before surgery, surgeon-prepared DMEK (sDMEK).The preliminary data show a trend towards more frequent need for rebubbing in the pDMEK group and a statistically non-significant lower postoperative endothelial cell count compared to the sDMEK group. However, the development of visual acuity and decrease in corneal thickness is comparable in both groups.Therefore, we investigated the clinical outcomes of the first organ-cultured preloaded DMEK cases and compared these outcomes with those from our very last cases with surgically loaded tissues from a single centre.

P44-A104†Logistics and results with precut and preloaded graft for DMEK.

PURPOSE: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) preparation is technically demanding and is a limiting factor for uptake of this kind of surgery. Supply methods that simplify the procedure for surgeons are key to increasing uptake. In this talk logistics and outcomes of Eye bank prepared DMEK tissue will be presented. METHODS: Laboratory studies of two different shipping protocols for DMEK (endothelium trifolded inwards and endothelium rolled outwards) will be presented. Clinical outcomes and complications of patients underwent to DMEK surgery with Eye bank prepared or surgeon prepared tissue will be presented. A Cost analysis of eye bank versus surgeon prepared endothelial grafts will be also part of the presentation. RESULTS: There was no difference in endothelial cell viability between surgeon or eye bank prepared tissue. Surgeon-stripped DMEK grafts in the laboratory investigation showed significantly higher elastic modulus and adhesion force compared to prestripped and preloaded tissues (p<0.0001). In the clinical data, rebubbling rates of 48%, 40% and 15% were observed in preloaded, prestripped and surgeon-stripped DMEK grafts, respectively. The cost analysis showed that eye bank prepared tissues had higher surgical expenses compared to those prepared by the surgeon, while the post-operative care expenses were similar between the two groups CONCLUSION: The Eye bank prepared tissues are a valid alternative to Surgeon prepared tissue, however need to be highlighted that with current method there is a decreased adhesion forces and elastic modulus in eye bank prepared tissues that may contribute to increased rebubbling rates.

P02-A121†Precut DSAEK stored in an active storage machine: feasibility study.

PURPOSE: The number of endothelial grafts precut by eye banks increases. Their shelf life is limited to a few days. We previously demonstrated the superiority of an active storage machine (ASM) over organ culture (passive) for whole corneas. AIMS: to measure endothelial viability of precut DSAEK after 3 or 10 days of storage in our ASM in a preclinical study. METHODS: Human pairs of corneas were included. The endothelial cell density (ECD in cells/mm2), and central corneal thickness (CCT in µm) were measured to ensure their initial intra pair comparability. After deswelling (CorneaJet, Eurobio) grafts preparation was performed by cutting the anterior stroma with a Moria linear microkeratome and keeping the anterior lamellae attached during storage. After randomization, one cornea was kept in the corneajet bottle (CJ) and the other was inserted into the ASM allowing a renewal or storage medium (CorneaMax, Eurobio) at 2.6 µL/min with 21 mmHg of pressure in the endothelial chamber. Both group of corneas were stored for 3 or 10 days at 31°C. The final viable ECD (vECD) was determined using the triple staining with Hoechst-Ethidium-Calcein-AM by an independent experimenter in a masked fashion. RESULTS: Initial ECDs were comparable: 2595±878 in ASM versus 2654±954 cells/mm2 in CJ for the 3-days period (n=5 pairs) and 2416±712 in ASM versus 2492±764 cells/mm2 in CJ for the 10-period (n=5 pairs). CCTs were also comparable. The anterior lamellae stayed attached in either the ASM or CJ. vECD was significantly higher in ASM than in CJ with respectively 2062±695 cells/mm2 versus 1632±633 cells/mm2 after 3 days either a cell loss of 20.5% and 38.5% respectively (p=0.0062) and 1082±649 versus 935±691 cells/mm2 for the 10-day period either a cell loss of 132% and 164% respectively (p=0.005). Grafts thickness did not differ after 3 days 219±25 µm in ASM versus 182±39 µm (p=0.063) or 10 days respectively 221±58 µm versus 189±48 µm (p=0.06). CONCLUSION: The storage of precut DSAEKs into the ASM allows a better preservation of grafts without use on deswelling storage medium. Nevertheless, the cell loss remains high after 10 days, suggesting a significant cell stress.

P43-A106†Eyebank stripped vs. Surgeon stripped tissue for DMEK.

During the recent years Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplsty (DMEK) has replaced penetrating keratoplasty and more or less Descemet stripping automated endothelial keraoplasty (DSAEK) as the goldstandard for the treatment of endothlial corneal diseases. Following DMEK the clinical recovery is faster and patients reach higher visual acuities with a lower risk for graft rejection. However, the technique of preparing the graft for DMEK is more demanding and less standardised than the perparation of a DSAEK graft. Therefore, the preparation may take longer and risk of a preparation failure seems higher. For this reason surgeons look for prestripped tissue for DMEK to avoid the potential inconveniences with the graft preparation. However, prestripped tissue might not always be advantageous as the graft might loose endothelial cells during storage and transportation and the surgeon is not aware of the specific properties of the graft. Advantages and disadvantages of eyebank stripped and surgeon stripped tissue will be discussed.

P37-A124†Smile bank - corneal stromal lenticules from relex smile - the new eye bank product.

PURPOSE: The aim of our presentation is to introduce future eye bank product - corneal stromal lenticule from living donors, which can be used for allotransplantation. METHODS: ReLEx (refractive lenticule extraction) SMILE (small incision lenticule extraction) is a common approach in laser eye surgery. It is minimally invasive and flap-free procedure. During this procedure part of corneal stroma (lenticule) is created by femtosecond laser and consequently removed through small incision. The lenticule is basically waste material of the ReLEx SMILE procedure. In the International Eye Bank of Prague, we decided to establish new protocol for lenticule withdrawal, storage and release for transplantation. RESULTS: All donors signed an informed consent, and their serum was tested for the presence of infectious diseases. After ReLEx SMILE procedure the lenticule was stored in container with cryopreservation solution and frozen in the eye bank using the same protocol for frozen amniotic membrane. After 6 months in -80°C tissues were defrosted and examined histologically, using conventional light histology staining and electron microscopy. CONCLUSION: We believe, that lenticule from living donor is a safe and effective tissue, that can be used for many indications and in particular situations represents good alternative to whole donor cornea and amniotic membrane.

P24-A114†Bringing together the eye banking community throughout Europe and beyond - promoting eye donation in Africa.

PURPOSE: It is estimated that globally there are more than 12.7 million corneal blinds with the vast majority of those living in the developing world. There is huge demand for corneal transplants worldwide as currently only one out of 70 patients can be provided with a cornea.Following the spirit of EEBA in bringing together the international eye banking community we present on our efforts and vision in contributing to the elimination of avoidable blindness in Africa by promoting sustainable eye donation programs. METHODS: At the congress of the South African Tissue Bank Association (SATiBA) in November 2022 a dedicated Round Table Discussion takes place on eye donation in Africa, organized by the World Union of Tissue Banking Associations (WUTBA) together with the Global Alliance of Eye Bank Associations (GAEBA), SATiBA and the German Society for Tissue Transplantation (DGFG). Individuals, national and global players in tissue medicine meet aiming to promote and advocate corneal donation in sub-Saharan Africa to establish patient care that is self-sustaining from within the countries.In preparation for the meeting a questionnaire was completed by the participants to understand the current situation in individual countries: Responses by ophthalmologists, tissue bankers, awareness and tissue donation coordinators from Kenya, Uganda, Nigeria, Ethiopia, and South Africa were evaluated. RESULTS: The survey revealed that all countries are establishing national health acts with references to tissue donation or have them in place with regulations still to be detailed. These are fundamental to strengthen confidence in tissue donation and to start developing donation infrastructures. In all countries there is doubt about donation after death showing the need for advocacy towards the public.The aim of the Round Table is creating a momentum of networking and sharing experience to support the African countries in building local infrastructures and becoming independent from tissue imports in the future. CONCLUSION: What frameworks must exist to successfully establish donation programs in Africa? What help can be provided by countries and organizations that have stable donation programs? These and other questions will be attempted at the Round Table. Bringing together experts, bundling synergies, and creating a momentum to promote cornea donation on social, political, and community level will be a step towards the vision of creating a world in which nobody is needlessly visually impaired.